online gaming
greg100
Posts: 32
Joined: Sep 09, 2006 8:58 pm
Posted: Apr 17, 2009 1:31 am
washington d.c district of corruption.sure the u.s government wants more money more greed im upset with this corrupted government we have the want to ban online gaming , but if they can regulate it that means more money for those b.....in washington........this country is falling way away from the land of the free the land of the geediest corrupted people ever,greed thats why are economy is the way it is now soon it will be a communist country,anyway i have some great acounts with microgaming i have had for good while,all the rest of all online casinos really suck anyway especially rival casinos what a waste,and all rtg aint worth a train over penny,,,later
TDTAT
Posts: 109279
Joined: Mar 11, 2006 7:06 pm
Posted: Apr 17, 2009 1:35 am
greg100, Thanks for your Feedback!
Maybe you would like the bill Barney Frank is trying to write now?
Maybe not? I think it is good. If casinos pay more taxes, that is less
for people to pay.
Regulation would protect consumers and make all casinos shape up
or go out of business!
Maybe you would like the bill Barney Frank is trying to write now?
Maybe not? I think it is good. If casinos pay more taxes, that is less
for people to pay.
Regulation would protect consumers and make all casinos shape up
or go out of business!
Gambling News - Barney Frank, standalone gambling legislation in April 2009
Barney Frank will introduce "standalone" gambling bill
April 8th, 2009 complied, edited by the GPWA
WASHINGTON, D.C. , USA - reported by Gaming Intelligence:
"Continuing his efforts to dismantle the anti-online gambling legislation passed by the Bush Administration, Congressman Barney Frank will introduce a bill which would establish a licensing and regulatory framework for online gambling operators before the end of April as a standalone bill."
"Barney Frank, Chairman of the US House Financial Services Committee, told The Hill congressional newspaper last week that the bill, Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act (H.R. 2046), would be a standalone bill despite the fact that Republicans added the legislation on the back of a vital port security bill in the 109th Congress.
"Commentators have suggested that the decision to introduce the bill as a standalone bill would make it even more difficult for it to pass through Congress. Congressman Frank said however that it would be 'inappropriate' to follow the Republicans' path. "That is not my intention. It would be a mistake. I want to do this with hearings, discussions and votes," Frank told The Hill.
"...Jeffrey Sandman, spokesman for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative which backs Frank's bill, told The Hill: 'We welcome a standalone bill, which would allow for a thorough discussion of all the issues relating to regulations and consumer protections.
"'The excitement over Congressman Frank's bill is that it would create an environment that would protect American consumers and include safeguards against underage gambling and compulsive gambling, which don't exist right now,' said Sandman..."
http://www.house.gov/frank/
http://www.barneyfrank.net/
